Tuesday, June 6, 2017

The London Bridge False Flag Attack: Official Account Of London "Terror Attack" Unravels

Well, it has been over 3 days since the latest "false flag" attack in London England, and the facts and real information about this attack is still a bit sketchy... There are still many puzzling aspects of this attack where apparently for this "false flag" there were real victims... But that makes sense for the criminals behind all of these "attacks" do indeed periodically need to have people really die to suit their agenda....

I for one have been digging into this "attack" and it is definitely different than that total fraud in Manchester....BUT the goal of the real perpetrators behind this latest attack is still the same in that they want to have the British people further placed under martial law, and to have them galvanized behind the criminal government's push for more wars against innocent people as part of the great fraud known as the "war on terror".....

I came across the following article that I definitely want to share with my own readers here... It comes from the World Socialist Website online at www.wsws.org and gives a pretty good assessment of how the so called "official account" of this latest "terrorist attack" on that London bridge is indeed full of shit..... The article is entitled: "Official Account Of London Terrorist Attack Unravels" and I have it right here for everyone to see for themselves... I do have my own thoughts and comments to follow:


Official account of London terror attack unravels

5 June 2017
Within 24 hours of Saturday’s terror attack at London Bridge, the official narrative presented by British Prime Minister Theresa May has begun to fall apart.
Speaking at Downing Street Sunday morning, May declared, “In terms of their planning and execution,” the attack in London and the May 22 attack in Manchester “are not connected.”
However, after police carried out a raid at the home of one of the attackers, a neighbour told the BBC that he had informed the authorities about the man’s Islamic extremist views, but nothing was done. “I did my bit,” he said. “I know a lot of people did, but the authorities did not do their bit.”
The London terror attack is following the same script as the Manchester bombing as well as countless other high-profile terror incidents throughout Europe, in which the attacks were carried out by people who had been known to the police. In many instances, warnings had been made about the perpetrators.
Just two weeks ago, suicide bomber Salman Abedi killed 22 people, including children, who had been attending an Ariana Grande concert in Manchester. As soon emerged, Abedi and his family were well known to MI5 and the government, which had used them, along with many other Islamists, in its regime-change operations in Libya and Syria.
Over the weekend, the New York Times reported that Abedi had travelled to Libya to meet with members of the Islamic State unit responsible for the November 2015 terror attack in Paris. Why he was allowed to return to the UK after this remains unexplained.
May has seized on the terror attacks in a desperate effort to reverse the steep fall in her opinion poll ratings ahead of the June 8 general election. With the latest polls showing the Tories with a mere one percent lead, there is widespread speculation of the Tories returning with a reduced majority, a hung parliament or even a Labour victory. With its social policies reviled by millions, the government is anxious to make the election a verdict on Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn’s supposed “softness” on terrorism and unreliability when it comes to national security.
May used her Sunday statement to make various pledges of what a Conservative government would do, despite an agreement with Labour to suspend political campaigning. While insisting that preventing terror attacks meant “taking military action to destroy ISIS in Iraq and Syria,” she stressed that Islamist terrorism “cannot be defeated by military intervention alone,” or by “the maintenance of a permanent defensive counterterrorism operation, however skilful its leaders and practitioners.”
The “leaders and practitioners” to which she refers, MI5 and MI6, are deeply involved in the closest of relations with Islamist groups, which they are even now wielding as proxy forces in regime-change operations in Libya and Syria. The British intelligence agencies allow members of these groups the free movement required to conduct terror attacks in the UK.
Britain also has close relations with Middle East despots who have for years backed and funded terrorist groups. Only days ago it emerged that May’s government is blocking the publication of an investigation into foreign funding of jihadi groups, authorised 18 months ago by her predecessor David Cameron, because of the “very sensitive” information it contains about Saudi Arabia, which accounts for 83 percent of UK arms exports. In April, May visited Riyadh to secure further deals.
May’s speech centred on her insistence that the assault on democratic rights that has accompanied the “war on terror” must now be stepped up. She outlined plans to deepen surveillance of the online activity of the UK population and censor the Internet, describing it as a “safe space” for terrorists. But, she continued, “We must not forget about the safe spaces that continue to exist in the real world.” What was required was “stamping it out across the public sector and across society.”
This is a threat to deepen the repressive measures associated with the Prevent Strategy, including the monitoring of pupils and students and an instruction that all those in positions of authority act as state informers.
May concluded with the claim that the vast array of repressive powers granted to the state security services and the police are still not enough. A “counterterrorism strategy” would be enacted “to make sure the police and security services have all the powers they need.”
In his response yesterday evening, Corbyn made clear that the working class cannot look to Labour to provide an alternative to May’s agenda of increased state repression and war. He made no attempt to warn the working class as to the dangers posed. Instead, he again accepted May’s official narrative almost in its entirety and focused his criticism on the government not having done enough to successfully wage the war on terror.
As he has done already by abandoning his opposition to NATO and accepting the Trident nuclear weapons programme, Corbyn sought to reassure the state of his loyal support. “You cannot protect the public on the cheap,” he said, insisting that “The police and security services must get the resources they need, not 20,000 police cuts” as had happened under the Conservatives.
Abandoning his previous opposition to the shoot-to-kill policy first revealed after the fatal shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes, in the aftermath of the July 7, 2005 London bombings, Corbyn said the police should be free to take “whatever action is necessary and effective... That includes full authority for the police to use whatever force is necessary to protect and save life as they did last night, as they did in Westminster in March.”
Robert Stevens and Chris Marsden

NTS Notes:  OK, I do disagree with some of the findings of this article and I will explain my differences here...

First, everyone with any common sense can see by now that the entire "war on terror" is in itself a massive fraud and swindle... It is a psychological battle on peoples' minds using "fear porn" to keep the masses subdued and wanting solutions to "terrorist attacks" which are actually created and propagated by their own criminal governments.... The solution offered by our criminal governments is of course to have their citizens surrender their rights and freedoms for the fraud of "more security"... This is the criminal method being used today to turn us all into slaves...

Second, it should be obvious to everyone that the people brainwashed and manipulated into doing these attacks were obviously well known by the criminals running the show... These "attackers" were supplied with the weapons, and the props, used to carry out this attack by the criminals in the government itself...

Yes, the goals of the criminal British government that ran this operation should be clear to everyone by now.. .Prime Minister May absolutely wanted this attack to take place at just this time to try to swing the vote into her criminal hands as well as use it as her excuse to further take away the rights and freedoms of the British people.... All that and also suppress the last avenue of true free speech left to mankind that is still not fully under criminal Jewish hands, the Internet itself....

Well, there you have it... .Overall a pretty good article that gives some explanations but misses the bigger picture of how the entire 'war on terror' is indeed a fraud.... I will continue to keep tabs here at this blog on any findings from this London bridge "attack" and will post up anything startling that I do come across here for everyone to see... Stay tuned...

More to come

NTS

2 comments:

Greg Bacon said...

When one dials 911--in the States--or 999 in England, it usually takes about 3+ minutes,from the time of the call, to dispatch, for the emergency units to arrive on the scene.

For the London police to then need only 4.5 minutes to track down, sift thru the terror-induced crowds--at night--and shoot the alleged perps is nothing short of fantastic.

Either London has some first-rate police or someone knew what was going to happen; when it would happen and the location so they could have units pre-placed with orders to 'shoot to kill,' which is the first rule of assassinations: After the hit, you murder the triggerman so the trail goes cold.

RANDALL HILBURN said...

In case anybody hasn't already heard. This morning of 6/7 there are reports that ISSIS has claimed credit for a terrorist attack in Tehran, Iran on their parliament. If this is true we all know who is behind it. The attack on Iran commences this way.